Topics surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and similar issues have been the subject of much discourse during recent months on Ithaca College’s campus. The discourse follows comments made by U.S. Congresswoman Ilhan Omar concerning American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that were deemed to be antisemitic in substance, if not in tone.

Ilhan Omar’s antisemitic comments have drawn rebuke across the political spectrum (

Are we to understand from Omar’s tweets that the U.S. government’s support for Israel is entirely based on (Jewish?) money and has nothing to do with policies independently decided by representatives of the American people, based on both moral and strategic grounds? Perhaps that is Omar’s view, but that is certainly not the view of mainstream America.

One can oppose the lobbyist system in American politics and wish for a time when decisions are completely untarnished by any perceived influence of money, but it is wrong and unfair to assume that AIPAC, or any lobby group, is monolithic and that Congress mindlessly works at their behest.

AIPAC has failed to win several high-profile policy decisions, with the most notorious being the failure to block the nuclear Iran deal implemented under the Obama administration. The fact that the U.S. withdrew from that agreement under the current Trump Administration attests more to the power of the president than the power of AIPAC.

What is most troubling about Omar’s remarks is that they perpetuate a lethal antisemitic trope that American Jews have “dual loyalty.” This idea has been used time and again to demonize Jews as traitors to their country because they (might) support the Jewish state over the country in which they live.

Currently, the U.S. State Department’s definition of antisemitism includes “Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations” in its tenets. This definition came into fruition during the Obama administration and has since been adopted into international law by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which is made up of 32 countries.

Anti-Israel protesters denounce the IHRA’s definition of antisemitism (

It is critical that we as a nation hold individuals accountable for disregarding these tenets and making international Jewish communities feel unsafe.

Recently, David Duke, white supremacist and KKK Grand Wizard, praised Omar for standing up to the “Zionist Occupation Government”  — a conspiracy theory in which the Jews run the U.S. government. While it seems like an unusual friendship, it actually makes sense; antisemitism runs rampant in the far right just as much as it does on the far left. Too often, the media chooses to highlight far-right antisemitism and overlook the creeping influence of far-left antisemitism.

Dismissing the criticism Omar has received as unjustified is disheartening, but understandable, given that not everyone is aware of the legacy of anti-Zionism’s relationship with antisemitism. Given that antisemitism is on a sharp rise in the United States, it is imperative that diverse communities come together in condemning all forms of antisemitism and hold representatives responsible for rhetoric that inspires antisemitism.

Originally published in The Ithacan.

Contributed by Ithaca University’s CAMERA-supported group Student Alliance for Israel.

arrow-rightArtboard 2arrowArtboard 1awardArtboard 3bookletArtboard 2brushArtboard 2buildingArtboard 2business-personArtboard 2calendarArtboard 2caret-downcheckArtboard 10checkArtboard 10clockArtboard 2closeArtboard 2crownArtboard 2documentArtboard 2down-arrowArtboard 2facebookArtboard 1gearArtboard 2heartArtboard 2homeArtboard 2instagramArtboard 1keyArtboard 2locationArtboard 2paperclipArtboard 1pencilArtboard 2personArtboard 1pictureArtboard 2pie-chartArtboard 2planeArtboard 2presentationArtboard 2searchArtboard 2speech-bubbleArtboard 1starArtboard 2street-signArtboard 2toolsArtboard 2trophyArtboard 1twitterArtboard 1youtubeArtboard 1